Newly created Projects within Client are not currently automatically added to Job Scheduler leading to a report run by Client missing time entries booked under the newly created project within Client. I thought you guys fixed it in June 2016, however, I have just done some testing and it is not working. SO, what I would like to have is that reports run by individual Clients include all the Projects within this Client, not just the ones which existed at the time when I created the Job Scheduler. I want the selection of projects within a Client to automatically expand within Job Scheduler without me having to update this report each time I add a new project. Inevitable, some projects will be missed as it is too manual and time consuming.

Ability to add budget to a project (not to the person / task).
Use Case: We have POs for the year tied to a project, the tasks under them are used to report on the type of activities being done, but all fall against the one budget. Each task is not budget driven, but the overall project is. This will also give the ability to look at current (past) project billing, budget and forecast a run rate (when the PO will deplete) for future weeks / month at a project level.

Enough of a requirement to have us consider / currently evaluating other software options.

When I have assigned new employees to a job, I go to the "Approval Template, move an employee in the list, press Done, press "Select All" for all the projects listed, mark "Update Employees belonging to Workflow" and press OK. It saves time as all new assignments are done at once.
I would like to have the same way for new jobs. Maybe I could create an “Approval Template” which is linked as example to the “Group by” of the projects. Then I could open up all new jobs, make the same I do with employees and all new jobs are updated at once.

Currently my company has a small custom software package designed by you to help handle some of the heavy lifting for administrating our system. However we use the hierarchy based limited access system to maintain our users and as I understand it currently we are unable to effect any of the limited access settings through the custom software/API. If you could expand this functionality to include this it would be extremely helpful.

For instance upon loading the custom program we provide users and teams for those users. The team names are a 1 to 1 relationship with the limited access group names. Therefore I would love for the custom solution to automatically add the users to the respective limited access group saving me a significant amount of manual work.

Also the admins maintain a list of custom notifications for managers of when their employees are missing time. With a user base of around 250 we obviously cannot have these reminder emails going out to everyone. So there is a different notification job for each team going to the respective manager for that team. Maintaining these list can be tedious and time consuming. Again if this could be automated via a universal and unique team name being the key for adding and removing employees to these notifications that would be extremely helpful.

Currently when a new user, team, etc. is added to the system via any means (front end, API, whatever) and you are using the limited access hierarchy based system this new add is applied to every branch of the limited access tree. This required the admin to take an additional step to go in and remove them from the groups they should not have access to and then add them to the ones they do.

At the very least I would like the ability to change the default so they do not get added to ANY limited access groups until the admin goes in and manually adds them. However being able to specify some of the limited access options upon adding a new attribute would be even better.

The audit trail needs additional detail. It seems to give only a vague blip for something being changed but not what changed or whom was changed. We need a way get a more detailed view of what happened historically.

When comparing the log entry from 3/4/15 (adding back an admin) to the changes on 2/26/15 (changing a user from one limited access team to the other) you see that the logs look exactly the same. They don’t say who the changes were for (User) or what changes took place (Ex. Team A to Team B).

There is only enough detail to ask more questons here not answer any.